[Tox Support] About licenses of using toxcore for a free public applicaton

Nocs ... nocos30 at hotmail.com
Thu Nov 16 20:05:33 UTC 2017

Thanks for your responses toxers,

yes i am a new to c++ i just learned it the last 2 years and now that it was time to move on for a public application even with the help of some ready libs such as tox as small parts of my full application i see that the only license that is not helping programmers is the GPL instead of it, it kills the freedom of any common programmer and giving the advantage to big sharks to steal ideas from us all.

I therefore cant also say anything about the tox devs. But i really don`t understand why they don`t protect their code in other license way.

They could also write their own license like many others did and since they wanted to prove that their code was clean by using open source project for it that doesn`t have to force all others if they want to use a lib from them to have to publicate the full program others also made.

As about my knowledge over tox i will say it straight out as i was always saying it.

I can`t even compile it.
I just took the ready shared-library for windowsx86-x64 with the four or five headers and the dll, i used them as library inside my application

and i just call the neccessary functions provided by them for my interface.

And for that a GPL is way to high cause is like forcing me to open all of my projects code not for security reasons but instead of this to ruin

my security by giving the full connections of all other functions also inside my application.

I hope master devs and the ones who believe in liberty and want to help the programmers community will do their own license or use something more light by giving the option to use at least tox-core without modifying it as i do and just using it as lib and its functions to be able to use it in closed code free of charge applications.At least that would be one of the parameter if they cant make it somehow else.

By the way here is 3 links that these programmers though they have open source projects they repsected the needs of other programmers and made their own licenses in a good way.




These above 3 are a RESPECT to common programmers society as i see it.

For me now that i am learning this whole license thing i clearly see that GPL is not giving and not protecting at all the common programmers,

it kills the hole community of programming and giving the rights to big sharks to create out of all the open sources new ideas for their big companies...

From: ☣Adam <adam at dc949.org>
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2017 7:44:48 PM
To: Nocs ...
Cc: nurupo; support at lists.tox.chat
Subject: Re: [Tox Support] About licenses of using toxcore for a free public applicaton

I can't speak for the toxcore developers and why they choose the license they did. At the end of the day, they put in the time and effort to write the code so if they only want to help GPL3 projects, that's their right. People who don't like their terms, can just wrote their own implementation of the protocol.

If you want an unencumbered implementation, the traditional way to get that is to write up a detailed specification and then have someone implement it who has never looked at the toxcore code. This ensures they aren't inadvertently copying any GPL code.

I think it'd be great to have multiple implementations of the library. That way if there's a bug in the core library it (probably) won't affect every piece of tox-based software. However, I've looked at all the code in toxcore, so I'm afraid I can't personally help you with the implementation.

I know it's not the answer you were looking for, but hopefully it gives you a path forward.


On Nov 16, 2017 11:18, "Nocs ..." <nocos30 at hotmail.com<mailto:nocos30 at hotmail.com>> wrote:

Thanks adam but why all programmers that want with their open source code to help also the programmers society and use their codes tend to be so blind and use GPL instead of their own license simple or open public or other way that doesn`t harm other programmers.

here is a respect programmer as to my words https://github.com/arvidn/libtorrent/blob/master/LICENSE

also check at this sqlite3 https://sqlite.org/copyright.html respect about using their code

Why an open source tox unique chat core want to make all others use their codes as open source if they use their lib inside their app just for simple functions?

Why do they help in that way the big sharks who got the money by using the GPL ready licenses and not the free common programmers society by using open license about their codes ?

From: ☣Adam <adam at dc949.org<mailto:adam at dc949.org>>
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2017 6:07:41 PM
To: Nocs ...
Cc: nurupo; support at lists.tox.chat
Subject: Re: [Tox Support] About licenses of using toxcore for a free public applicaton

It'd have to be a separate application with some interprocess communication (IPC) mechanism. For example, on POSIX systems, there is sendmsg().

Always make sure to understand the terms of the license *before* using someone else's code. It's a lot easier to deal with up front than at the end.

On Nov 16, 2017 09:54, "Nocs ..." <nocos30 at hotmail.com<mailto:nocos30 at hotmail.com>> wrote:

Thanks for the response nurupo :/

its a bit of disaponting the GPLv3 issue.

Which of tox devs knows best what i can do about the license cause i need to use it somehow in my application but for free public use and i

really don`t want to make it open source but its free.

Is there anyone in tox devs that knows if i can do something else since i only use the core unafected ?

From: nurupo <nurupo at tox.chat>
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2017 1:51:43 PM
To: Nocs ...
Cc: support at lists.tox.chat
Subject: Re: [Tox Support] About licenses of using toxcore for a free public applicaton


toxcore is licensed under GPLv3, as seen in
https://github.com/TokTok/c-toxcore/blob/master/COPYING, so to use
toxcore in your application you have to comply with the terms of the
GPLv3 license.

> The application is a free in all its services but not an open source
> code application.

Afaik, GPL license requires you to release your application under GPL
license and provide the full source code of your application to your
users. There should be no difference if you link it statically or
dynamically. You are probably thinking of LGPL, which has a linking

I might be mistaking though, I have only basic understanding of licenses
and by no means am I an expert in them. There are professionals in the
legal field which deal with licensing, they should be able to help you
with understanding licenses.


On 2017-11-15 17:50, Nocs ... wrote:
> Hello toxers,
> its been a long time and since i am on the latest test of some
> application of mine that uses tox-core shared library i wanted to ask
> you
> about the license of toxcore.
> Do i need to place anything on my application as text, inside or
> outisde as a file if i make my application public ?
> The application is a free in all its services but not an open source
> code application.
> I haven`t modified any code inside tox i only use the tox-core as is
> from the shared library and i use the code and functions i need from
> inside it.
> What kind of license thing does tox need to be inside my app and how
> can i use it if anything is needed ?
> Thanks in advance
> _______________________________________________
> Support mailing list
> Support at lists.tox.chat
> https://lists.tox.chat/listinfo/support

Support mailing list
Support at lists.tox.chat

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.tox.chat/pipermail/support/attachments/20171116/76be1614/attachment.html>

More information about the Support mailing list