From v_2e at ukr.net Sat Aug 8 15:29:10 2015 From: v_2e at ukr.net (v_2e at ukr.net) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2015 18:29:10 +0300 Subject: [Support] UDP or TCP for traffic-saving? Message-ID: <20150808182910.28922ed80163a05ac8b59e68@ukr.net> Hello! I would like to know which mode consumes less traffic -- UDP or TCP? Both during the conversation and in stand-by mode. Thank you! Vladimir ----- From chuongv at gmail.com Sat Aug 8 17:06:38 2015 From: chuongv at gmail.com (chuong vu) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2015 10:06:38 -0700 Subject: [Tox Support] [Support] UDP or TCP for traffic-saving? In-Reply-To: <20150808182910.28922ed80163a05ac8b59e68@ukr.net> References: <20150808182910.28922ed80163a05ac8b59e68@ukr.net> Message-ID: Hello Vladimir, Using TCP will consume less traffic. Chuong On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 8:29 AM, wrote: > Hello! > I would like to know which mode consumes less traffic -- > UDP or TCP? > Both during the conversation and in stand-by mode. > > Thank you! > Vladimir > > ----- > > _______________________________________________ > Support mailing list > Support at lists.tox.chat > https://lists.tox.chat/listinfo/support > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From chuongv at gmail.com Sat Aug 8 17:10:56 2015 From: chuongv at gmail.com (chuong vu) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2015 10:10:56 -0700 Subject: [Tox Support] [Support] UDP or TCP for traffic-saving? In-Reply-To: References: <20150808182910.28922ed80163a05ac8b59e68@ukr.net> Message-ID: Just to clarify, TCP will consume significantly less traffic than UDP in both conversation and stand-by mode. On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 10:06 AM, chuong vu wrote: > Hello Vladimir, > > Using TCP will consume less traffic. > > Chuong > > On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 8:29 AM, wrote: > >> Hello! >> I would like to know which mode consumes less traffic -- >> UDP or TCP? >> Both during the conversation and in stand-by mode. >> >> Thank you! >> Vladimir >> >> ----- >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Support mailing list >> Support at lists.tox.chat >> https://lists.tox.chat/listinfo/support >> > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Jfreegman at tox.chat Mon Aug 10 16:50:15 2015 From: Jfreegman at tox.chat (Jfreegman) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 16:46:15 -0004 Subject: [Tox Support] [Support] UDP or TCP for traffic-saving? In-Reply-To: References: <20150808182910.28922ed80163a05ac8b59e68@ukr.net> Message-ID: <1439225415.2712.0@mail.tox.chat> To clarify some more, UDP mode uses significantly more bandwidth than TCP-only mode overall, however this is mostly due to DHT traffic. TCP packets are obviously a little bigger than UDP packets, meaning a video conversation with TCP will use a bit more bandwidth than with UDP if you disregard DHT traffic. The difference is probably trivial though - if saving bandwidth is your primary concern you should be forcing a TCP connection. On Sat, 8 Aug, 2015 at 1:10 PM, chuong vu wrote: > Just to clarify, TCP will consume significantly less traffic than UDP > in both conversation and stand-by mode. > > On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 10:06 AM, chuong vu wrote: >> Hello Vladimir, >> >> Using TCP will consume less traffic. >> >> Chuong >> >> On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 8:29 AM, wrote: >>> Hello! >>> I would like to know which mode consumes less traffic -- >>> UDP or TCP? >>> Both during the conversation and in stand-by mode. >>> >>> Thank you! >>> Vladimir >>> >>> ----- >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Support mailing list >>> Support at lists.tox.chat >>> https://lists.tox.chat/listinfo/support >> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From v_2e at ukr.net Tue Aug 11 09:36:23 2015 From: v_2e at ukr.net (v_2e at ukr.net) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:36:23 +0300 Subject: [Tox Support] [Support] UDP or TCP for traffic-saving? In-Reply-To: <1439225415.2712.0@mail.tox.chat> References: <20150808182910.28922ed80163a05ac8b59e68@ukr.net> <1439225415.2712.0@mail.tox.chat> Message-ID: <20150811123623.18b24373959ddf898f501d1f@ukr.net> Hello! On Sat, 8 Aug 2015 10:10:56 -0700 chuong vu wrote: > Just to clarify, TCP will consume significantly less traffic than UDP > in both conversation and stand-by mode. On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 16:46:15 -0004 Jfreegman wrote: > To clarify some more, UDP mode uses significantly more bandwidth than > TCP-only mode overall, however this is mostly due to DHT traffic. TCP > packets are obviously a little bigger than UDP packets, meaning a > video conversation with TCP will use a bit more bandwidth than with > UDP if you disregard DHT traffic. The difference is probably trivial > though - if saving bandwidth is your primary concern you should be > forcing a TCP connection. > Thank you for your responses. I did not quiet understand, what about the DHT traffic in TCP mode. Why does it consume less traffic than in UDP mode? Or is it absent in TCP mode? I thought DHT is the basis of all the Tox network, and thus it is a necessary activity. Isn't it? Thanks! -----